Relationship between contact functions and how a type persuades others

It is my understanding that contact functions are used when run into unfamiliar external problems, such as when we have a disagreement with someone or need to convince someone to do something. Constructivist types have contact Logic while Emotivist have contact ethics, and Tacticians have contact sensing while strategic types have contact intuition. Therefore I'm going to hypothesize that we get the following styles of persuasion in the types:

ST style persuasion (ESE, ILE, ESI, ILI): These types can be forceful, stubborn and unyielding when disagreeing with others. They insist heavily on their point of view and try to get others to give in through their excessive force.

NF style persuasion (LII, SEI, LIE, SEE): Able to skillfully manipulate the emotions of others into doing what they want. Can consciously or unconsciously play the role of a victim in order to gather support in conflict scenarios.

NT style persuasion (EIE, SLE, EII, SLI): Prefer to appeal to other's rationality and sense of logic. Often bring up ideas for alternative courses of action in order to improve situations.

SF style persuasion (LSI, IEI, LSE, IEE): Try to persuade others with sort of physical object or action, such as offering money to do something. Reward good behavior and punish bad behavior.

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service - if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read the FAQ at http://ift.tt/jcXqJW.

Relationship between contact functions and how a type persuades others