Hello

I am an industrial psychologist and aspiring politician. Some of my biggest influences are C.G. Jung and Aushra Augusta (duh), Victor Gulenko, David Keirsey, Karl Marx, Vladimir Lenin, Anton LaVey, and Francis Galton. My political beliefs tend to be right-wing, although I do have admiration for some 20th-century Communist leaders.

I am interested in Socionics because of its potential to be used as a praxeology, not merely a theory. I have seen evidence that VI does indeed work, and I believe that with some further development, the technique will be able to identify a person's type almost without fail. One of my goals in life is to rise to a position of political power and implement Socionics on a wide scale. I believe that this will greatly increase productivity in the workplace and elsewhere.

Taking after Keirsey's view that temperament is more important than individual type, I believe that quadra is more important that individual type. I always describe Socionics in simplified terms when pitching the system to potential adopters, focusing mainly on the quadras and largely omitting the types. One of my issues with mainstream Socionics is how overly convoluted it is, which I think is why MBTI tends to be so much more popular with the general public. Focusing on quadras instead of types eliminates this issue.

That is all I would like to share for now. I look forward to discussing with all of you in the future.

Let's block ads! (Why?)

Hello