the dual-seeking fct is a supposed 1D fct. it is able to process the so-called parameter of experience but nothing more.
A good illustration of this self-perception is an example of sight. We cannot transfer to others our own experience with vision. One can say: "This is blue color", but at the same time we don't know how other people see blue. One would need to become the eyes of another to obtain his or her experience.
The meaning of word "experience" in Socionics is different from the commonly used and understood meaning: "The combination of knowledge, skills, abilities, acquired from life, practical activities, etc." [4].
In common usage, it can be said that "experience passes from generation to generation." However, what is actually transferred between generations is knowledge, which in Socionics terms most closely correspond to the dimension "norm."
Experience, in Socionics terms, is impossible to transfer, just as much as one cannot pass one's own perceptions and sensations.
my questions:
1) how do you perceive your understanding of information coming from your DS fct (or of that information aspect) as "idiosyncratic" (or do you perceive it that way)?
2) how do you find you're unable to translate this information (your "experiences") into so-called "norms"?
please also share which information element you're so hot on the heels of, as that will lend necessary context to your response.
This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service - if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read the FAQ at http://ift.tt/jcXqJW.
how is your DS "idiosyncratic"?
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire